The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.
Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a disagreement between a closed attraction, public officials and advocacy groups.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned debate over their future often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been closely studied by the humans who interact with them daily.
After the Canadian government prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the federal government pays for the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.
Scientists say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something a former trainer discovered directly.
She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a position that entailed gaining confidence of the marine predators.
“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their personalities. She formed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different natures.
“One whale chose me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I view relationships.”
Her relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their confinement.
During her time at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand effects of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”
The park did not reply to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … get far better medical attention and 24/7 supervision than any person in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”
The former employee was terminated from the park in early March following the death of Eos, an unwell beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park believed details of the incident were shared to the press and she was released shortly thereafter.
The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in distress. She says the park’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “immense staff”, vehicles and specialized tools.
“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs calls for the whales to be transferred right away from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.
In recent months, Canada’s government official denied a proposal to export the whales to China.
“Allowing the application would have meant a continued situation in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As Canadians, we know that whales are meant for the sea, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience approve an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But the former trainer said the official’s remarks indicate a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas born in captivity.
“The society needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”
As officials work to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of nourishment for local populations.
A proposed sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a sustainable resolution for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ fate.
Different voices say the idea of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the near future.
Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|